jSign vs SIGN.PLUS Comparison

Shifting from traditional wet signing to electronic signatures is a change worth making, but choosing the best e-signature software is not always straightforward as they all offer similar tools. Fortunately, side-by-side e-signature software comparisons can reveal subtle differences.

On the surface, jSign and SIGN.PLUS are almost identical. They’re both newcomers to the e-signing industry and were developed by renowned online fax service companies.

Their similarities don’t stop there, though. Both provide a reliable service and offer similar tools for creating signatures and customizing documents. However, they differ in some areas, like the number of users and templates they support.

Features

Main Features	jSign	SIGN.PLUS
Logo
Rating
Reviews	Reviews	Reviews
Visit	Visit Site	Visit Site
Draw Signature
Type Signature
Upload Signature
Sign Pad
Digital Signatures
Payment Collection
Cloud Storage
# Stored Templates	3	Unlimited
Custom Templates
Custom Branding
Forms
Deadlines
Reminders
Multiple Signers

With jSign being so straightforward, it’s easy to assume that SIGN.PLUS is a bit more difficult to use, but it’s just as user-friendly as its competitor. There are only two significant differences between the services when it comes to creating signatures – SIGN.PLUS provides 16 fonts for typed signatures rather than four but doesn’t support sign pads.

SIGN.PLUS supports unlimited users when signing up for its highest-tier plan. It also has a text editor, offering basic but useful tools like signature placeholders, text boxes, and checkboxes.

On the other hand, the software streamlines the process of dealing with signers, from sending documents to setting reminders and deadlines. Unfortunately, there’s no option for bulk-sending documents. Just like jSign, SIGN.PLUS doesn’t have a library of forms, but it does allow the use of unlimited templates.

It’s safe to say that SIGN.PLUS provides a more extensive list of features regarding e-signature types, document editing, and contract template management. Even so, jSign slightly makes up for its shortcomings by providing envelopes for bulk-sending documents.

Privacy and Security

Fundamentally, e-signature software respects users’ privacy, as it must follow strict regulations like the eIDAS and ESIGN acts to be a legitimate service. Both jSign and SIGN.PLUS adhere to these acts and therefore provide the means to create legally-binding signatures.

Additionally, both are HIPAA-compliant, making them a viable choice for medical professionals. SIGN.PLUS follows extra privacy laws as well, such as SOC 3, PCI DSS, and Switzerland’s e-sign act called ZertES. Conveniently, all of SIGN.PLUS’s privacy certificates are downloadable.

Both offer audit trails for tracking documents and issue completion certificates at the end of a signing process. These certificates reveal signers’ locations, IP addresses, and the browser they’ve used for signing.

jSign uses blockchain technology to protect data, preventing information tampering by blocking users from manually modifying data. In addition, the software lets users restrict or specify signing locations and ask for two-factor authentication (2FA) from third-party signers.

2FA can also be used for account security, where the one-time passcode can arrive by email or SMS. Moreover, jSign doesn’t store files in a centralized location. In fact, documents are automatically deleted after a day if not converted into templates.

SIGN.PLUS also has a few additional security tricks up its sleeve. For example, it ensures DDoS protection through its in-house content delivery network. It also provides encrypted storage space.

Overall, it’s easy to see that jSign is the more secure e-signature provider. The platform clearly pays more attention to account and document protection with blockchain technology. Furthermore, its signing location restriction tool is essential for protecting sensitive data from scammers.

Ease of Use

When comparing the usability of jSign and SIGN.PLUS, the differences are minor. Both are accessible e-signature solutions with logically designed dashboards. Sending documents happens directly from the respective interfaces. In addition, neither jSign nor SIGN.PLUS requires signers to create an account for signing documents.

Having said this, SIGN.PLUS doesn’t facilitate contact saving, while jSign users can save unlimited third-party contacts. On the other hand, self-signing is significantly easier for SIGN.PLUS’s subscribers due to ‘Sign Myself’. In comparison, jSign users have to send a document to themselves to be able to sign it.

SIGN.PLUS outshines jSign’s device support, with the latter only having a web app. Fortunately, this version of the software is mobile-optimized, and the drag-and-drop design comes in quite handy. However, this doesn’t come close to SIGN.PLUS’s remarkable mobile app.

Other than letting you draw signatures with a finger, SIGN.PLUS’s mobile app can scan printed documents for e-signing. Finally, it sends push notifications when a signature request comes in, the signing is finished, or it’s due soon.

Pricing

jSign offers a 14-day free trial, which Best Reviews readers can extend to 30 days. At the same time, SIGN.PLUS has a free plan that’s perfect for personal use, providing unlimited self-signing and three signature requests a month. Regardless, both the free trial and version give users a chance to try the platforms out for free, which is essential considering neither provides refunds.

SIGN.PLUS might be more expensive than jSign, but the latter offers only monthly billing. This pricing structure means reducing jSign’s prices is almost impossible. In comparison, SIGN.PLUS offers up to 40% discounts with annual billing.

There’s also a difference between what the platforms’ various pricing plans offer. For example, SIGN.PLUS unlocks additional tools with more expensive subscriptions, whereas jSign increases monthly quotas with its higher-tier plans.

Customer Support

SIGN.PLUS has limited channels for helping out customers directly. Specifically, contacting the company’s agents is only possible via email on business days. The alternative is to get in touch with the parent company, Alohi, via Facebook or Twitter.

jSign provides more modes of communication besides email. Specifically, the company’s agents are available 24/7 via phone and live chat.

Additional help on SIGN.PLUS’ end includes a blog containing e-signature topics, such as the difference between e-signatures and digital signatures. The Swiss provider also has e-signature legality guides alongside its thorough FAQ page.

jSign also has step-by-step usage guides for its platform. These are highly informative, but what really helps users get to grips with the software quickly is the hints that appear while inserting placeholders into a document.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, neither jSign nor SIGN.PLUS is a clear winner. After all, both are user-friendly, secure, and legally binding. They support customers in managing their contacts by letting them set reminders and deadlines. Moreover, documents can be sent to multiple signers, even if you can only save contacts with jSign.

The final choice ultimately comes down to user support, templates, and price. jSign’s cheaper plans allow a maximum of two people, so it’s a good choice for freelancers and accountants. Even small businesses can take advantage of it if contracts are handled by one or two team members.

Meanwhile, SIGN.PLUS supports unlimited users with its highest-tier plan. This detail makes it well-suited to businesses that vary in size, like real estate agencies. The flexibility regarding templates and the company’s various compliances means it’s a viable solution for law firms as well.

If you’re still on the fence, it’s best to learn more about the product before committing. Consider reading our comprehensive reviews of jSign and SIGN.PLUS to find out about the platforms in more detail.