Best Reviews logo
Medical alert systems
AI Comparator
Best Reviews may receive compensation for its content through paid collaborations. See how we sustain our work & review products.
Medical Guardian vs GreatCall Comparison

Medical Guardian vs GreatCall Comparison

By Irina P. Irina P. Verified by Richard C. Richard C.Last updated: February 6, 2025 (1)
Table of contents

The advantages a medical alert system brings are undeniable. But with so many offers on the market, which one is most suitable for you or your loved one? Take Medical Guardian and GreatCall, for instance. The first has devices designed for indoors and outdoors. This equipment is easy to use and has fall detection and waterproof features. Medical Guardian stands out with great monitoring services. The second company, GreatCall, has innovative devices that simplify the lives of the elderly.

Overview
Monitoring equipment
Pricing
Payment options
Customer service
Overview
Medical Guardian
GreatCall Splash
Brand/logo
Visit brand site
Read review
Rating
24/7/365 monitoring
Medical monitoring
2-way communication
Fall detection
Fire detection
CO detection
Activity monitoring
Medication monitoring
Multilingual assistance
Overview comparison for Medical Guardian, GreatCall Splash

Medical Guardian

With six different devices designed for indoors and outdoors, Medical Guardian was established in 2005. It is BBB rated with an A+ and it holds a UL Certification. This company really stands out for its personal emergency service, which is prompt, helpful, and reliable. It is available 24/7, all year round, and is made up of 911 or EMT trained professionals who can help in case of an emergency. Clients can also choose to personalize their contact list and decide who should be contacted first if needed.

Its six devices offer numerous features. Five of them also present the optional fall detection functionality. Even though Medical Guardian’s devices do not have medical dispensers or any environmental detector features, its reasonable pricing and trained monitoring team make it a reliable choice when it comes to medical alert systems. The provider doesn’t bind its clients to long-term contracts and offers prorated refunds on cancellations.

Medical Guardian Homepage

 

GreatCall

Founded in 2006, GreatCall provides many technological innovations that are designed especially for senior citizens who want to lead an independent life. Among these, there is the Lively line of devices. There are two such devices, the first being the Lively Mobile Plus, which is a medical alert system without a base unit that can be worn in a pocket, on a belt, in a purse, or around the neck.

The second device, Lively Wearable, can turn a smartphone into a piece of rapid response equipment. This is where the innovation begins. This device works with a smartphone to provide the user with the possibility to ask for assistance if needed. This equipment also has a fitness tracking function, which is useful for motivating seniors to stay active. Both of these systems have fall detection and are waterproof. GreatCall charges a flat rate fee for its devices, followed by a monthly fee. The cheapest plan, Lively Mobile Plus, costs $37.49, plus an activation fee and the monthly charge.

GreatCall homepage

Conclusion

Medical Guardian brings simple, efficient devices with outstanding monitoring services. With many features, its devices prove to be straightforward and reliable. Five out of six of its medical alert systems feature fall detection. GreatCall, on the other hand, is an innovative provider. Its Lively Wearable product turns a smartphone into an urgent response device. Both these pieces of equipment are waterproof and have the fall detection function. Prices with GreatCall are a bit higher. After knowing the facts, the decision on which one you should choose is entirely yours.

User feedback

    Ronald McBurney Ronald McBurney
    I would think that if anyone is profiting from providing emergency products and/or services to disabled or elderly people (age should NOT be a factor at all) companies and manufacturers should also have at the least some positive statements about their potential customers. In other words, they should be required to provide a complete and comprehensive approach to their willingness (or lack of) to be open and above board with what is or is not a part of their monitoring method system, anything that will cost the people needing or using their devices more money and exactly how much that will go up or not. Another thing is, 30 days isn’t even close to what might needed for the individual or Individuals paying for the privilege of having such a device, simply because no one knows if they will or will not have an emergency in the first thirty days or not, and since nothing happened, what do they know about any company? Do they know how they will be treated by the businesses involved? Will they raise the costs of their services to everyone? If anyone or a bunch of people use those services frequently? As need be in some cases? Will there be a grace period before they dump someone they are losing money from? Is there an ultimate basis of evidence that they can or cannot dump someone whose needs are greater than expected by the businesses? Or is anything in the contract? Is the contract in a form of communication of negative results for the businesses? And more particular, why is government, state or federal, making some kind of effort to monitor the monitors in the first place?
    No comments with that rating.

 Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Best Reviews

Best Reviews may receive compensation for its content through paid collaborations and/or affiliate links. Learn more about how we sustain our work and review products.

©2012-2025 Best Reviews, a clovio brand – All rights reserved
Privacy policy · Cookie policy · Terms of use · Partnerships · Contact us